Website with LESS and SASS: Which One Will You Go For?

Website with LESS and SASS: Which One Will You Go For?

When it comes to CSS preprocessor language, then individuals normally face much of a dilemma between the application of Syntactically Awesome Stylesheets (SASS) and LESS Stylesheet Language. Obviously, as a curious CSS user, you have every right to know which stylesheet language is most suitable for your web application needs.

So here, we will try to make a comparison between the website with SASS and website with LESS on various parameters and try to reach a better conclusion online.

The Language Ability

When it is about the creation of a dynamic website template, then LESS can execute conditional mixins. Mixin is generally a class of object oriented programming language, that comprises of a combination of methods that come from other classes. The conditional mixin has its limitation as it only works when a specific condition is true. For instance, in order to create a responsive template, you may require to have a darker background with light color text or vice-versa.

But that is not the case with SASS. It simply follows a proper programming with robustness in the language. It is basically this robustness in the language that realize the existence of Compass. That is the reason why when it comes to the ability of the language, then SASS is a slightly better option than LESS.

The Variable Handling

When you are creating a template, the effective handling of the variable is very important. Here, it is significant to note that LESS applies @, whereas, SASS applies $. It is worth mentioning that in CSS there is no basic meaning of the dollar sign. Whereas, @ tends to have its relevancy such as ‘@keyframes’, ‘@media’ queries, etc.

When it comes to the scope in the variables, then SASS has its own limitations, but it is somehow at par with LESS. That is the reason why it is hard to pick one out of both. Therefore, when it comes to the variable handling, then you can call it a tie between both the preprocessor languages.
Operating with Media Queries

Here, the new version of SASS is comprised of better features than LESS. The @media queries generated by LESS are not bad, but adding blocks at the bottom of the main stylesheet generates a disconnection between the responsive styles and the original styling.

On the other hand, the Nested media queries that are accessible with SASS are far more supportive to operate. That is why, we can say that when it comes to a website operating with media queries, then SASS is much more reliable option to look for.

In Math

In most of the areas, the math of both the CSS preprocessor languages is identical to one another. But when the applications based on units are handled, then LESS tends to assume the first unit only, ignoring the further units. But in the case of SASS, you will get a clear message of error denoting- Incompatible units: – ’em’ and ‘px’. Here, it is quite obvious that getting the error is a more feasible option than getting the whole calculation wrong. Hence, SASS will be declared as winner.

If you are going for a bootstrap template design, then both the languages are better at their places. It is not like LESS based bootstrap theme is a bad option. If you are comfortable with it, then you can give preference to the same.